Linking Science, Inquiry and Language Literacy

Linking Science, Inquiry, and Language Literacy (L-SILL)
Preliminary Impact Findings:

Evidence is beginning to emerge showing that high-quality teacher professional development in Linking Science, Inquiry, and Language Literacy plays a key role in improving student achievement in both science and language literacy. Described below are some of the preliminary findings from the L-SILL project in Maine:

What impact has the L-SILL project had to date?
The L-SILL Cohort 1 and 2 schools are beginning to report results for this program. After just two years data is indicating that:

  • Science is part of the core curriculum, as reported by building principals.

  • Instructional time for science has increased (1/3 of survey responses report an increase in the instructional time for science) in many of the schools from Cohort 1.

  • Increased confidence in teaching science, reported by participating teachers.

  • Increased use of expository writing in science class (survey responses, artifacts, and interviews).

  • Increased use of nonfiction text in science class (self-reporting by administrators and teachers- survey).

  • Involvement in L-SILL professional development various among schools. The Cohort 2 schools (2006-2008) are showing greater participation in their first year than the Cohort 1 schools (2005-2007) (Table 1). Greater involvement in L-SILL program by districts and teachers preliminarily appears to be linked to student achievement gains.
Table 1: PD hours and teachers in L-SILL project through Oct 2008

  L-SILL School# PD Hours# of Teachers
Cohort 1Hall-Dale14111
Cohort 1Hebron Station256.517
Cohort 1Readfield265.510
Cohort 1South Bristol1304
Cohort 1St. George238.511
Cohort 1Whitefield287.59
  Totals131962
  Hours per teacher21.27 
       
Cohort 2Jefferson37214
Cohort 2Gardiner72334
Cohort 2Kennebunk20414
Cohort 2Madison27226
Cohort 2Southport124.54
  Totals1695.592
  Hours per teacher18.43 
  • Trends in the amount of improvement in student performance on the MEA are very positive for science, literacy and mathematics as compared with the state scores for 4 of the 6 Cohort 1 schools where teachers have been in the program for two years. The Cohort 2 schools 2nd year of data will be collected in the spring of 2008 so no useful achievement data is available. (see Graphs 1-4 of percent of change in the content areas by performance levels.)

Graph 1. So. Bristol - Change in Student Performance for students in one school on the MEA test grade 4 over two years as compared to the State.


Graph 2. St George School - Change in Student Performance for students in one school on the MEA test grade 4 over two years as compared to the State.


Graph 3. Halldale - Change in Student Performance for students in one school on the MEA test grade 4 over two years as compared to the State.


Graph 4. Hebron - Change in Student Performance for students in one school on the MEA test grade 4 over two years as compared to the State.

Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance